Comments on: Fantasy Final Four: How Would a Syracuse-Kentucky Title Game Have Looked?

By: Hoffman

Hoffman — Thu, 05 Apr 2012 01:55:12 +0000

Carlton – there’s no doubt that SU could win and would win a few, but it’s not 50/50. It’s just not and I had SU winning it all before Fab went out. I would have been wrong. This UK team is just disgustingly good and for a college team is as good as we’ve seen recently.

By: Andy

Andy — Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:27:33 +0000

Even with Fab, I think SU would have had a tough time scoring in the half court against them. Kentucky just shuts down the paint defensively and without dependable 3pt shooting it would get ugly fast. A lot of our points come from driving/slashing to the hoop and those opportunities are just not very easy against uk.

By: Carlton

Carlton — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 23:59:19 +0000

Look at what the ville did to uk /w their zone. An they are a much smaller team. All the blow hards at espn wanted u to think they could beat a zone but the truth is uk wasnt a great outside shooting team an that was a bigger reason for uk’s “off night” then them just not playin well. Sure lamb could knock them down but miller was ethier hot or cold. His avg doesnt show that bc if he missed the 1st couple he just defer to all the micky d’s ballers an stop shootin. Im guessin jb would have packed the zone in an shaded to the shooters. This would have stoped the dribble drive an helped us rebound just enough to win. So I think its more like a 50/50 split if we played 10x bc of our zone /w fab. If ur talkin about /w rak then im not sure if we win 1 outta 10.

By: chris

chris — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:38:55 +0000

With Fab it might have been a good game. Without Fab it would have been a monumental ugly game for our history. We will never know.