Can Syracuse Secure a No. 1 Seed in the NCAA Tournament?

Follow The Fizz on Twitter for the latest SU basketball news

via ESPN

Timing is everything, especially when it comes to college basketball rankings. Syracuse found itself ranked inside the top 5 for 13 consecutive weeks. The Orange once had its name on the VIP list for a  no. 1 seed in the NCAA Tournament. But after dropping four of its final six regular-season games, no. 11 SU is on the outside looking in. And the ten bouncers in its way may not budge.

But is there actually a chance of Syracuse securing a no. 1 seed? If Syracuse ran the table in Greensboro, could it vault itself to the top of the East Regional? It’s possible. But not probable.

Over the last 25 years, no team that was ranked no. 10 or higher at the conclusion of the regular season—heading into its conference tournament—nabbed a no. 1 seed in the big dance. Seven times, though, during the last quarter century, a team that was ranked as high as ninth in the nation at the end of the regular season did make the leap to a top seed. Take a look at the list. The four no. 1 seeds are listed for each of the last 25 NCAA Tournaments, with their rankings a week before the big dance in parenthesis.

2013               (1) Gonzaga, (3) Indiana, (4) Louisville, (7) Kansas                                           

2012               (1) Kentucky, (2) Syracuse, (4) UNC, (8) Michigan State

*Michigan State went 3-0, and won the Big Ten Tournament

2011               (1) Ohio State, (2) Kansas, (3) Pittsburgh, (5) Duke

2010               (1) Kansas, (2) Kentucky, (3) Syracuse, (4) Duke

2009               (1) UNC, (2) Pittsburgh, (3) UConn, (5) Louisville

2008               (1) UNC, (2) Memphis, (3) UCLA, (4) Kansas

2007               (1) Ohio State, (2) Kansas, (6) Florida, (8) UNC

*UNC went 3-0, and won the ACC Tournament

2006               (1) Duke, (2) UConn, (3) Villanova, (4) Memphis

2005               (1) Illinois, (2) UNC, (3) Duke, (8) Washington                         

*Washington went 3-0, and won the Pac-10 Tournament

2004               (1) St Joe’s, (2) Stanford, (5) Duke, (8) Kentucky

*Kentucky went 3-0, and won the SEC Tournament

2003               (1) Arizona, (2) Kentucky, (3) Texas, (6) Oklahoma

2002               (1) Kansas, (2) Maryland, (3) Duke, (5) Cincinnati

2001               (1) Stanford, (2) Michigan State, (3) Duke, (4) Illinois

2000               (2) Stanford, (3) Duke, (5) Michigan State, (9) Arizona

*Arizona finished the season 2-0

1999               (1) Duke, (2) Michigan State, (3) UConn, (4) Auburn

1998               (1) Duke, (2) Arizona, (3) Kansas, (4) UNC

1997               (1) Kansas, (2) Minnesota, (5) UNC, (6) Kentucky

1996               (1) Kentucky, (2) UMass, (3) UConn, (4) Purdue

1995               (1) UCLA, (2) Kansas, (3) Kentucky, (7) Wake Forest

1994               (1) Arkansas, (3) Missouri, (4) UNC, (6) Purdue

1993               (1) UNC, (2) Indiana, (3) Michigan, (4) Kentucky

1992               (1) Duke, (3) Kansas, (5) Ohio State, (8) UCLA

*UCLA Finished the season 4-0

1991               (1) UNLV, (2) Ohio State, (5) Arkansas, (7) UNC

1990               (1) Oklahoma, (3) UNLV, (7) Michigan State, (8) UConn

*UConn went 3-0, and won the Big East Tournament

1989               (1) Arizona, (2) Oklahoma, (3) Georgetown, (4) Illinois

Of those seven teams, there is a common trend. All of them either won their conference tournaments, or went undefeated the last week of the year (the Pac-10 at the time did not have a conference tournament from 1991-2001, so UCLA in 1992 and Arizona in 2000 played their regular-season slates straight through the end of the usual conference tournament week).

Bottom line, if there’s any chance that SU can jump seven slots in the rankings, it has to win the ACC Tournament in its debut season. What helps the Orange is if that was to happen, the Cuse would go through two teams ranked ahead of them, no. 7 Duke and no. 6 Virginia. The Tournament matters. In 1990, UConn went a perfect 3-0 in the Big East tournament and jumped over Kansas, who was the no. 3 team in the country at the time. Kansas had even been ranked no. 1 or no. 2 for the previous three months of that season, but because it lost in the Big Eight Championship game, it lost its no. 1 seed to the Huskies.

The same situation happened in 2007. UNC and Florida were both ranked outside of the top 5 at the end of the regular season, but both won their respective conference tournaments. Wisconsin sat at no. 3 in the country, but lost in the Big Ten title game. The Badgers were out, and the Gators and Tar Heels snatched no. 1 seeds.

It’s still pretty unlikely that Syracuse grabs a no. 1 seed. In addition to winning the ACC Tournament, it would need a ton of “help” from the teams in front of it. Florida and Wichita State are locks at this point. The Shockers finished 34-0, and even if the Gators were to lose their first game in the SEC Tournament, they’d still have a no. 1 seed. Over the last 25 years, the nation’s top ranked team heading into conference tournament week has nailed down a no. 1 seed, regardless of what they’ve done in their respective conference tourneys. The only exception was in 2000, when (at the time) mid-major Cincinnati lost its first game of the Conference-USA tournament. That’s what enabled no. 9 Arizona to sneak in and grab the final no. 1 seed.

So there are still two no. 1 seeds available. Right now, Villanova and Arizona occupy the no. 3 and no. 4 rankings, respectively. The Wildcats will most likely have to go through Doug McDermott and Creighton to win the Big East. And that’s not good news for ‘Nova. The Jays ripped them twice this year, each time by 20+ points. Arizona will not face a ranked team in its Pac-12 Tournament, which would make a lose look even worse.

The remaining teams in front of Syracuse are all in different conferences. #5 Louisville (American), #8 Michigan (Big Ten), #9 San Diego State (Mountain West), and #10 Kansas (Big 12). That means if they all were to lose in their tournaments, no other team would have an upper hand over the Orange.

The odds are not in Syracuse’s favor to secure a no. 1 seed, but even advancing to the ACC Championship game would lock SU in for a no. 2 seed. Win it, and SU might just find itself atop the East Region like it has yearned for all year.

Posted by: Kevin Fitzgerald


Filed Under: FeaturedHoops

Tags:

RSSComments (4)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. orangeinva says:

    Not as far-fetched as thought…
    Selection Committees love using the phrase “body of work” when determining seeds. Cuse was ranked 1 or 2 seemingly half the season. So we win 4 in a row and maybe take out 2 teams in the top 6 in the process and we don’t deserve a #1?

    Tough crowd!

  2. Syracuse is not only a legit #1 seed, but the favorite to win the whole NCAA Tourney.

    It’s obvious to any experienced basketball observer, that Syracuse is the #1 team when Grant & the starters are at 100%.

    Grant has been out until FSU, & they lost when he was absent. I feel sorry for the rest of the field, because they all know Syracuse will be under-seeded, & this means some other good school will be exiting the Big Dance a bit earlier than planned…

  3. Carlton says:

    I’ll say it again. With how everything has shaken out the Duke ‘Cuse game would be the De facto 2 seed in the east game. Win and we get the 2 seed if we don’t well who knows what happens.

  4. Slim says:

    I hope, you’ll enjoy these last few days at home watching ski jupming and then return back to the team in the middle of next week in Kligenthal.;)Tommorow, you have to show coaches what are you capable of and we all know you belong at the top and deserve a place in the team again..You’re an excellent ski jumper and whole team need you, no matter what, right now.Everything you’ll need tommorow are perfect conditions, good mood and believe just in yourself..don’t worry, you can do it on the highest level!!:DI’m glad that you keep us informed about you and what is going on in ski jupming world every day so keep it up..Greets & good luck!;P

Leave a Reply