Share

ESPN’s Pathetic Slow Play of the Laurie Fine Tape & Why Doc Gross is Silent

Three new themes grinding through D.A.’s cerebellum on the Fine scandal.

Another day, another set of stories to sift through. Wouldn’t it be nice to just be focused on the bowl math for football and a top 3 team in America taking the court again tonight? Instead, it’s “As the Orange Burns” – every day on Soap Net. Listen to Fizz Radio’s Special Report covering all angles of the effect this will have on SU. Here’s three dynamics I can’t get out of my mind.
  • ESPN slow-played the Laurie Fine tape for dramatic effect.
Sports by Brooks published an intriguing video this morning asking the moral question: If ESPN had the tape for nine years, how did it not have the same responsibility to alert authorities that any civilian does? You could argue on behalf of ESPN, like the Post-Standard has, the tape itself does not corroborate Davis’ story. That legally, both media outlets could get slammed by slander litigation had they run this without Mike Lang’s second accusation.

 

But why did ESPN hang onto the tape ten days after the initial report? The excuse that the entity needed tech experts to validate Laurie’s voice is totally pathetic. Wouldn’t that have been done weeks, months, if not years ago? You have a story and this evidence for nine years. There is no need to run the Davis/Lang accusations immediately. You can obviously wait the ten days to get it all lined up. But ESPN wanted to “own” the Syracuse story and is right now soaking it for all its worth. What’s next? Sunday we’ll have hidden video footage of Jim Boeheim in Bernie’s room at the ’87 Final Four?

 

ESPN is not responsible for protecting Boeheim from himself. But had this tape been released with the initial report, The Per’fesser would have never come out so strongly in support of Bernie, nor accused Davis/Lang of extortion. So ESPN “breaks” the story, smirks as Boeheim buries himself, then hides behind the flimsy excuse “we needed to wait to have it verified.” We thought ESPN was playing fast and loose with journalistic standards before? This is a new low.
  • Is Dr. Gross so silent because he led the ’05 internal investigation? 
I have yet to hear SU place specific dates or names on the university inquiry six years ago. But Gross was hired by Syracuse in ’04 and the investigation occurred some time the next year. Remember the culture Gross walked into. He was met with skepticism for being an outsider, was seen as a hotshot from the West Coast who was constantly shmoozing using dueling cell phones, and hired a questionable football coach in Greg Robinson.

Could Gross have actually led an unbiased in-depth, dirt-digging investigation into the background of a pedophile assistant coach, which may have brought down the program and a civic legend in Boeheim? No chance. More likely, Gross was caught in the unenviable position of having to look for something, but not wanting to find too much. Now, he’s gone into hiding as the public searches for answers. Not a coincidence.

 

This is not to absolve the university of Gross of blame. Mike Waters told WFAN yesterday there’s evidence SU did turn a deaf ear to some of Davis’ claims in ’05. Waters said police recently contacted people Davis pointed them towards who said they were never called by the university six years ago. Syracuse probably never wanted to know the entire truth and Fine should be prosecuted to the fullest if there’s evidence. But it makes sense why Gross has gone into the bunker.
  •  The Taiwanese animation is outstanding. 
This entire situation makes your stomach churn. But at long last, something to smile about. This video is amazing. We scoff at the ridiculousness of these pieces, but there’s some incredible symbolism and artistic interpretation going on. No wonder why they’ve become a cultural phenomenon. Fine getting tossed from a game by the official and being hit by thrown oranges? Davis sullenly walking by three blind monkeys with the Syracuse, ESPN and Post-Standard logos on them? Mark Schwartz literally kicking the tape under the rug?

 

There are some bizarre representations that are over my head. The Penn State logo gushing water out both sides? CNN finally reporting the story? Laurie Fine looking svelte? But overall the Taiwanese knocked this out of the park. You know it’s bad when this is the bright spot of your day. Maybe I’ll send this link to Daryl.

 

Posted: D.A.

 

10 Comments on this Post

  1. ESPN will be complicit if additional abuse victims come forward – if in fact any abuse actually occurred – given their moral lapse in not contacting proper authorities.
    Just canceled my subscription to ESPN sites – and will not watch sports on any of their networks.

  2. If it is discovered that there were other victims after ESPN has possession of tape, they should expect a pretty big lawsuit. ESPN hiding behind their journalistic excuses is appalling. They are no different than McQueary. They say they couldn’t collaborate Lang’s story, well they did when they secretly taped her to verify voice.

    Disgusting

  3. The part with the Penn St logo appears to represent asking for forgiveness from the priest. The water is a stream of tears and this is the only chance of saving the soul of the university.

    Just a guess

  4. so they couldn’t have spent the money to have the tape analyzed until last week…? not that hard to get a voice sample, real reason is that their lawyers knew that the tape was too sketchy. still suspicious that Lang never vouched for Davis until now
    I find it very hard to believe that Nancy Cantor would white wash any investigation, she has nore scruples than protecting the basketball program over the good of the university

  5. Good theory on the water out of the PSU logo. That one is making my head hurt. I just can’t believe how shaky ESPN’s journalistic standards have been through all of this.

  6. It is truly a nice and helpful piece of info. I’m happy that you simply shared this useful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

  7. Heya i am for the primary time here. I found this board and I find It truly helpful & it helped me out much. I hope to provide one thing again and help others such as you aided me.

  8. I don’t write a leave a response, however I browsed a great deal of comments on this page ESPN

  9. I am really inspired with your writing skills and also with the format for your blog.
    Is that this a paid subject or did you modify it your self?
    Either way stay up the excellent quality writing, it is rare to see a great weblog like this
    one today..

  10. Hey would you mind stating which blog platform you’re working with?
    I’m planning to start my own blog in the near future but I’m
    having a tough time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs
    and I’m looking for something unique. P.S Apologies for getting off-topic but I
    had to ask!

Leave a Comment

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree